Our first round has already run. The next one is being planned now. This is the programme for busy doctors who have the clinical experience and want their name on PubMed: the five reasons it hasn't happened yet, and the system that connects every fix into one clear path from idea to submission. Join the waitlist and you'll be the first to know when the next round opens.
Registration for the next round opens soon. Join the waitlist and you'll hear about it before it goes out publicly, with the dates and how to register.
Round one has closed. Add your name and we'll tell you the moment the next round opens, before it's announced anywhere else. Open to working doctors.
What we cover
Most doctors recognise themselves in at least three of these. None of them are about intelligence or effort. In the session, we walk through what's really going wrong, and what to do instead.
The decision that sinks a paper is made in week one, but the symptoms don't appear until month four, deep into data collection. By then the time is already spent. There is a way to know which ideas are worth your weekends before you commit to any of them.
A strong clinical hunch and a publishable research question look almost identical on paper. They are not the same thing, and the gap between them is where most projects quietly stall. The structure that closes that gap is simple, once someone shows it to you.
Introduction, methods, results, discussion. The order you were taught to read a paper is the order that makes writing one take months. Working clinicians who publish fast use a very different sequence, and it sits at the heart of our method.
Picking the journal after the paper is written is one of the most common reasons for a desk rejection. The doctors who get accepted make that decision before they write a single word, and it quietly changes everything that comes before it.
"I'll do it on the weekend" is how research quietly dies. Four protected hours a week, properly defended, will take you further than ten scattered ones. The protection is the part almost everyone gets wrong, and it is far less about willpower than you would expect. We show you what actually holds, even on a full clinical rota.
Here is the part most doctors miss. These are not five separate problems. They are five symptoms of one missing thing: a system. In the live session we connect all five into a single method, the one behind the Publication Accelerator, and show you exactly how it carries a clinician from idea to submission.
Your Hosts
Two clinicians and researchers who have lived the gap between clinical work and publication, and built a clear way across it.
Founder & Host
Co-Host & Research Methods
By the end of the session
Free, while you wait
You don't have to wait for the next round to start. These are the same two tools we hand every clinician on day one. Free to download, no call required.
Most of us were taught to write a paper in the order we read one. Introduction first, abstract last. That order is exactly why drafting drags on for months. This is the reverse sequence working clinicians use, where each stage of your project quietly writes a different section of the paper, long before you sit down to "write it up".
Before the first incision, we brief the theatre list. The same discipline tells you whether a research idea is worth your weekends, long before you consent a single patient. This is the short checklist we run on every idea to catch the ones that will quietly stall, before you spend any time on them.
Common questions
It puts you first in line. When the next round opens, people on the waitlist hear before anyone else, with the dates and how to register, before it goes out publicly. Seats each round are limited, so the list matters.
We're planning the next round now and haven't fixed the date yet. The fastest way to know is to join the waitlist. You'll be the first to hear the moment it's set.
Yes, completely free, with no upsell on the call. At the end there is an optional chance to apply for the next cohort of the paid Publication Accelerator programme, for those who want a deeper, hands-on engagement. That part is entirely optional.
This is designed specifically for practising clinicians: consultants, registrars, and fellows, with clinical exposure they can draw from. If you're earlier in your training, much of the content will be premature. We'll have other resources for you soon.
Most working doctors have more publishable material than they realise: case series, audits, clinical observations, registry access. The first reason we cover is exactly this: finding what's already in front of you.
Sometimes. If you already have clinical data in hand and the timing is genuinely urgent, we keep a small number of assessment calls open between rounds. It's a short, honest conversation to see whether the programme fits where you are right now. If it does, we'll find you a place. If it doesn't, you'll leave with a clear next step either way. Request an assessment call.
Don't let another year pass
The first round has already run. Join the waitlist for the next one and be first to know when it opens. Free, for working doctors.
Join the Waitlist